Skip to Content Skip to Navigation

Starlight Troubadours: Stories/ Degrees

UG _ // – meta _ torus – meta _ omni – meta _ event # 93

Posted on July 29, 2012

 

. . . - - we ' re shifting into example mode immediately here , , and noticing that the following example uses PARTIALLY EMPTY ACT _ IFIER UG PHRASE STRUCTURE , , and the PARTIALLY EMPTY LEXICAL PARTICLE MARKER ' do ' , , to indicate / gather the folded WHEN dimension vector , , which id – shellF describes the flow of actual event resolution / realization information in termZ of verb TENSE CONVENTIONAL nomenclature review : : :

 

a ) . . . - - ' shelia   does   like   trains ' . . .

                 stfr         act      act     stfr

 

b ) . . . - - ' some   one   likes   trains   ;    ;   shelia   does ' . . .

                 inv        stfr     act      stfr       alg     stfr       act

 

. . . - - in example ' a ' ; ; the act _ ifier particle ' does ' carries folded MIDDLE / INNER PROPORTIONAL WHEN information of present abstract event processing tyem , , and syntactically allows fore the actual assignment of HOW categorically defined semantic property value information , , which is it _ shellF transferred from the marker ' likes ' . . .

 

. . . AND ALL THE WAYE ALONG , , AZZZ WII HAVE BEEN RIDING , , AND AS EYE HAVE FORE ' TOLLED , , IT IS THIS SYNTAX / SEMANTIX REALIZATION RATIO , / = / , # , = // , COMBINED WITH THE MIDDLE LEVEL / INNER LEVEL UG PROCESSING META PROCESSING DANCE , , WHICH IS CONSTANTLY REVEALING ALL OF THESE OVERLAPPING & UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES & AXIOMATIC TRUTH ABOUT THE ENTIRETY OF ALL CREATION ITSELF . . .

 

. . . - - wii can also say that the middle / inner level UG interface for the acti _ ifier marked ' does ' , , connects up EVERY SINGLE LEXICAL ITEM IN THE EVENT SYMBOL STRING itself / THEMSELVES , , and formZ causal relationz to THERE / THEN ; ; complete event generation , , including the application fore ' itZ own embedded / assigned WHEN ' present ON GOING PROCESSING TYEM GRADIENT POSITIONING as well ; ; @H -- _ @H TELL . . .

 

. . . - - example ' b ' demonstrates a similar phenomenon , , and additionally makes use of the EMPTY algebra _ fier UG PHRASE FUNCTOR , , WHICH IS DENOTED BY THE OVER SENTENTIAL SYMBOLS OF [ , , ] , , THEM SELVES ; ; and which sets up a two sentence ANTECEDENT – CONSEQUENCE comparison / computation , , where the folded HOW dimensional shell information content , , is transferred to the COMPLETE CONSEQUENT FOLLOWING EVENT , , that itself is partially empty and requiring that missing information , , in order to truly be realized & complete . . .

 

. . . - - wii can take this algebra _ fier antecedent / consequence grouping _ ordering a step farther , , and EMPTY out a complete event ' s MAIN THEME ITSELF , , which then FORCES THAT EVENT / SENTENCE TO REQUIRE _ REQUEST THE PROVISION OF & FORE ' THAT MISSING INFORMATION CONTENT ITSELF , , INN META MULTI THEMATIC WHY DIMENSIONAL STRATEGIC PROCESSING SPACE & TYEM FORE ' SOOTH . . .

 

. . . - - this then leads to the MULTI LEVELED ; ; MULTI THEMATIC event full _ fill – meant SITUATION OF questioning THE SOURCE / THE PLACEMENT / THE REASON / & THE STRATEGIC PURPOSE ; ; all at once , , & STRATEGICALLY PRAGMATICALLY META WRAPPED THEMATICALLY all A – round , , regarding the accomplishment towardz ALL those antecedent , , requiring requesting needing QUESTIONING , , DESIRING , , event realizable potentialZ ALL THEMSELVZ – SHELLZ A Ll Ll Ll Ll TOLLED . . .

 

c ) . . . - - ' WHAT   does   shelia   like ? ? ? '

                 stfr         act       stfr         act

 

d ) . . . - - ' WHO   likes   trains ? ? ? ' . . .

                 stfr       act        stfr

 

. . . - - and [ to ] → ' put ' → [ this ] → [ inn proper perspective ] , , [ which , , by the waye , , makes the lexical item ' puts ' A THREE PLACE THEMATIC RELATION ACT _ IFIER UG PHRASE , , like the item ' took ' from UG meta event # 92 ] , , letz look at a ' pure ' TWO PLACE THEMATIC COMPLETE EVENT FOLDED DIMENSIONAL WHY RELATION , , where the actual event itself IS COMPLETE , , and a meta thematic WHY truth condition is being META CREATED , , as a meta doubly open ended recursive proofing style example of meta thematic proofing style id _ shelf . . .

 

e ) . . . - - ' does   shelia   like   trains ? ? ? '

                 act      stfr         act     stfr

 

f ) . . . - - ' yes   she   does ' . . . OR SIMPLY JUST USE . . . - - ' yes ' . . .

               ALG   stfr    act                                                        -> ->   ALG   <- <- <- 

 

. . . - - U C ; ; these EMPTY lexical markers aren ' t empty inn the symbolic sense , , they are empty inn the EVENT FORMATIVE & PROGRESSIVE SENSE , , where missing dimensional vector information needs to be landed , , connected , , & and vanished , , in order FORE THAT SAME EVENT , , ITSELF , , & all of the inter connected meta structural / strategic eventZ as well , , to realize the required threshold potential criteria , , in order to be created , , and exist as they SO desire themselves _ them shellZ . . .

 

. . . - - and here is a perfect example of PRAGMATIC LINGUISTIC VOICE & VALIDITY , , WHERE VERY ONE KNOWS THAT THE SIMPLE RESPONSE OF ' yes ' within that specified context , , cons – tee _ TOOTZ , , a totally valid & real & perfect & ACCEPTABLE GRAMMATICAL UTTERANCE IN AND OF ITSELF , , CASE CLOSED . . .

 

. . . - - eye ' m SORRY ABOUT THE GRANDSTANDING , , but sometimes pragmatists , , eye prefer the symbolic expression of ' pragmaticians myself ] , , especially in academic linguistic circles , , don ' t get the proper FOOTING & FLOOR POSITION WHICH THEY DESERVE , , certainly not the same space as LOGICIANS GET , , AND EYE PERSONALLY DON ' T SEE ANY DIFFERENCE IN the meta logical skills and methodological proficiency between those two circle / CAMPS of critical academic thought ; ; OH WELL . . .

 

. . . - - o . k . ; ; true 2 form , , now that wii are inn waye over every oneZ head , , ii '' LL just sAye un _ 2 – U ; ; DO not go off the deep end now ; ; will U ? ? ; ; shore . . .

 

. . . - - that ' s e _ nuff fore ' now ; ; and watch those TRANSFORMATIONS OF english lexical item WORD ORDER ; ; eye just set U with a whole slew of them , , which have CONSEQUENTLY been the CAUSE OF MORE LINGUISTIC CONFUSION AND MISUNDERSTANDING , , then just about anything else in the entire history of linguistics as a formal art & science , , then anything else around . . .

 

. . . - - in fact , , if wii look at the true repercussions and total thematic GOVERNMENT MISS _ HANDLINGZ OF TRANSFORMATION GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURE , , it probably could account fore ' mush of the difficulties which the entire planet has encountered , , over the last fifty yearZ themselves / hoursleves / yorselves , , were – shell_ – _ – _ – _ – ves . . .

 

. . . - - forever always now ; ; gab _ r – ieL # Lex – i _ con